Ms: Orléans, Bibl. Municipale, 266, pp. 291a-293b
Inc.: Boethius dicit in Hypotheticis syllogismis (PL 64, 842D) quod, si medius terminus dissimiliter enuntietur in utraque propositione, non possunt concludi extrema nec ullus potest fieri syllogismus nec propositio una. ...
Exp.: ... Si enim tota integralia removeri concederemus ad cuiuslibet suarum remotionem partium, nulla possemus evitare cautela quin ex huiusmodi procedet concessione periculum.
Ed.: Transc.
Notes
Discussions against those who solve some sophismata with pointing out the dissimilitudo among the terms in the proposition and the assumption.
references to "m(agister) Gosl(inus)", "m(agister) Petrus", "m(agister) Galt(er)ius", and "m. Vlg. et ceteri asitiatii(?)"